Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Soundfindr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
58
Highlights
36
Differences
10
Reactions
0
Likes
HyperX Quadcast S
vs
Razer Seiren X:
58 Highlights & 36 Differences —
So, Which Microphone Actually Works Better
Find out why the Quadcast S is ideal for users seeking flexibility and advanced onboard controls.
We put HyperX Quadcast S and Razer Seiren X head to head to see which microphone wins in performance, build, and price. Compare their features and onboard controls, body material, stand/tripod & model name now.
HyperX Quadcast S vs Razer Seiren X: Which USB Condenser Mic Fits Your Streaming Setup?
Both the HyperX Quadcast S and the Razer Seiren X serve the core purpose of delivering high-quality condenser microphone performance tailored for streaming, gaming, and broadcasting. Each targets PC and Mac users with compact desktop designs and features that benefit content creators, podcasters, and professional streamers alike. Both mics offer USB connectivity, headphone monitoring, and onboard controls for muting and monitoring, but their designs diverge significantly when it comes to versatility, accessory bundles, and advanced features.
The Quadcast S shines with multi-polar pattern switching, studio-grade preamps, tactile controls with gain adjustment, and smart assistant compatibility, making it a feature-rich device with added flexibility. On the flip side, the Seiren X zeroes in on a supercardioid polar pattern that specializes in focused vocal capture in a slim, lightweight form factor built for simplicity and broadcast-level use.
Why the HyperX Quadcast S Takes Center Stage
The HyperX Quadcast S brings a wealth of versatility to the table, setting it apart with its multiple polar patterns: cardioid, omnidirectional, and bidirectional. This feature alone allows a streamer or podcaster to tailor their setup for everything from solo broadcasts to multi-person conversations or ambient sound capture, a flexibility the Seiren X cannot match. Moreover, the Quadcast S features a studio-grade internal preamp that ensures clean gain stages and a transparent audio profile. Its integrated shock mount and pop filter work in tandem to reduce unwanted vibrations and plosives, improving clarity with minimal setup hassle.
Additional convenience comes from touch panel controls and knobs for gain adjustment and mute, features that the Seiren X lacks. These intuitive controls make it easy to manage audio levels without needing additional software. Plus, smart assistant compatibility with Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant brings another layer of modern interactivity. Its detachable USB-C cable enhances portability and cable longevity, while the included accessories, like extra windscreens, adapters, and a protective foam insert, deliver great value for its price.
The Razer Seiren X Holds Its Ground with Focused Simplicity
Although less versatile, the Razer Seiren X appeals to those who want a compact, professional-grade microphone optimized for crystal-clear voice pickup. It sports a supercardioid polar pattern designed to hone in on the user's voice while rejecting side noise more aggressively, which can be excellent for noisy or shared environments. Its slimmer, compact form factor and lightweight plastic build provide good portability and fitting in tighter spaces, a great advantage for streamers with limited desk real estate.
Another subtle strength is the dual input connectivity supporting both USB and TRS interfaces, along with dual output options. This can be invaluable for users who want to connect to various equipment, such as mixers or audio interfaces, beyond the standard PC setup. The Seiren X also boasts a transformerless design that reduces distortion and noise, contributing to its clear, professional sound quality. While it lacks onboard gain control, pop filters, and advanced software features, it maintains a streamlined setup for users who prioritize straightforward, crisp audio capture over extra bells and whistles.
Quick Take
The HyperX Quadcast S wins for streamers and gamers who want flexible multi-pattern functionality, integrated controls, and a robust accessory bundle, all wrapped in a durable metal chassis. On the other hand, the Razer Seiren X suits those who prefer a more minimalistic, focused approach with superb voice isolation and versatile input/output options, although at a slightly higher price point.
Bottom Line
When choosing between these two USB condenser microphones, the HyperX Quadcast S emerges as the more versatile and well-rounded option, especially for content creators seeking customizable pickup patterns, easy controls, and a full accessory set; all at a competitive price tag (around $89.99 at amazon.com). If you prefer a compact, straightforward microphone optimized for clear voice capture with professional broadcast features, the Razer Seiren X remains a solid, albeit less flexible, contender.
Verdict
Winner: HyperX Quadcast S - Its multi-pattern versatility, quality onboard controls, smart assistant support, and comprehensive accessory bundle give it a clear edge for a broad range of streaming and recording scenarios.
Runner-up: Razer Seiren X - Offers excellent voice isolation and dual connectivity in a compact form but lacks flexible patterns and onboard gain control, making it a niche pick for focused users.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
Is HyperX Quadcast S better than Razer Seiren X? Depends on your playstyle. This deep microphones breakdown includes specs, feel, tone quality, and what musicians think.
67
HyperX Quadcast S
1Votes
Cardioid, Omnidirectional, Bidirectional
88
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Supercardioid
vs
Polar Pattern Type
The HyperX QuadCast offers multiple polar patterns including Cardioid, Omnidirectional, and Bidirectional, providing versatility. In contrast, the Razer Seiren X features a Supercardioid polar pattern, which is more focused. Users needing flexibility will prefer the QuadCast.
Identifies the default pickup pattern.
In the battle of Polar Pattern Type,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
lower
21 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Polar Pattern Type,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 0 votes.
I gotta say, the multi-pattern support on the Quadcast S is a huge plus. Being able to switch between cardioid, omni, and bi-directional makes it way more flexible for different recording situations.
80
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Streaming, Broadcast, Podcast
vs
Intended Use
HyperX QuadCast is intended for Streaming and Gaming, while Razer Seiren X is aimed at Streaming, Broadcast, and Podcast use. The Seiren X offers a slightly broader range of specified uses including broadcast and podcasting.
Describes the primary application area.
In the battle of Intended Use,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
HyperX QuadCast offers 'Black,Red' color options. Razer Seiren X provides more choices with 'Black,White,Mercury' color options, allowing for greater aesthetic preference.
Available product colors.
In the battle of Color Options,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Color Options on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
The HyperX QuadCast is known by its model name 'QuadCast', distinct from the Razer Seiren X, which is named 'Seiren X'. These are the specific model identifiers for each product.
The specific product identifier from the manufacturer.
In the battle of Model Name,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Model Name on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Year of Release
What year was it released?
91
HyperX Quadcast S
1Votes
2020
83
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
2017
vs
Year of Release
The HyperX QuadCast was released in 2020, making it newer than the Razer Seiren X, which was released in 2017. The QuadCast is a more recent model by three years.
Indicates when the microphone was launched.
In the battle of Year of Release,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
8 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Year of Release,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 0 votes.
I tend to lean towards newer tech, so the 2020 release year for the Quadcast S is a plus. The Seiren X being from 2017 feels a bit older in comparison, though both are solid.
See more
Mounting Type
What is the mounting type?
79
HyperX Quadcast S
1Votes
Shock Mount
53
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Stand, Boom Arm
vs
Mounting Type
HyperX QuadCast supports Stand and Shock Mount mounting types, while Razer Seiren X supports Stand and Boom Arm. The QuadCast includes a shock mount, whereas the Seiren X is designed to be compatible with a boom arm.
The typical mounting or support style.
In the battle of Mounting Type,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
26 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Mounting Type,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 0 votes.
The integrated shock mount on the Quadcast S is super handy for reducing vibrations. It means I don't need to buy one separately like I might for the Seiren X if I choose to upgrade its stand.
See more
Compatibility
Which devices or platforms are compatible?
89
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
PC, Mac
88
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
PC, Mac
vs
Compatibility
Both HyperX QuadCast and Razer Seiren X are compatible with PC and Mac platforms. This ensures broad system support for both microphones.
Lists supported platforms and devices.
In the battle of Compatibility,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Form Factor
What is the form factor?
44
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Desktop
43
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Desktop
HyperX Quadcast S
With a desktop form factor, this microphone is stable and sturdy on any desk setup, perfect for streamers or podcasters.
Razer Seiren X
Desktop form factor, making it easy to use on a table with a stand or mic arm.
Describes the physical style of the microphone.
In the battle of Form Factor,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Form Factor on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Connectivity Type
What is the connectivity type?
69
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
USB
48
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Wired, USB
vs
Connectivity Type
The Connectivity Type for HyperX QuadCast is USB, whereas Razer Seiren X specifies both Wired and USB options. This means Seiren X explicitly highlights its wired nature in addition to USB.
Defines how the microphone connects to devices.
In the battle of Connectivity Type,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connectivity Type on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Gender Target
What is the gender target?
99
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Unisex
98
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Unisex
HyperX Quadcast S
Designed to be user-friendly for all genders, the QuadCast S is versatile and accessible for everyone.
Razer Seiren X
Suitable for all genders, with no specific design features targeting one gender over another.
The marketing target by gender (if specified).
In the battle of Gender Target,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gender Target on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Age Group
What is the age group?
59
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Adult
78
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Adult, Professional
vs
Age Group
Both HyperX QuadCast and Razer Seiren X are targeted at Adult and Professional age groups. This indicates both are designed for serious users.
The intended user age bracket.
In the battle of Age Group,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Age Group on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Application Category
What recording applications is it best for?
86
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Streaming
85
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Streaming, Broadcast, Podcast
HyperX Quadcast S
Optimized for streaming, ensuring excellent sound quality for live broadcasts and recordings.
Razer Seiren X
Best for live streaming, podcasting, and broadcast use, where clear, high-quality sound is essential.
Specific contexts where the mic is best suited.
In the battle of Recording Application Category,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Application Category on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
User Skill Level
What is the user skill level?
74
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Intermediate, Professional
73
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Intermediate, Professional
vs
User Skill Level
HyperX QuadCast is suitable for Beginner, Intermediate, and Professional user skill levels. Razer Seiren X is aimed at Intermediate and Professional users, suggesting a slightly higher entry point.
Recommended audience expertise level.
In the battle of User Skill Level,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Skill Level on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Launch Region
Where is it available?
69
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Global
68
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Global
HyperX Quadcast S
The QuadCast S is available globally, ensuring widespread accessibility for users in various regions.
Razer Seiren X
Available worldwide, with a presence in major markets including North America, Europe, and Asia.
Where the product is primarily available.
In the battle of Launch Region,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Launch Region on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Limited Edition
Is it a limited/special edition?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
Not a limited edition, ensuring long-term availability for customers looking for a reliable and durable microphone.
Razer Seiren X
This model does not have any special or limited editions.
Whether the model is a limited or special release.
In the battle of Limited Edition,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Limited Edition on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Product Type
What is the product type?
49
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Condenser
48
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Condenser
vs
Product Type
The Product Type for HyperX QuadCast is USB, whereas for Razer Seiren X it is Condenser. This highlights a difference in how the product is categorized or its primary interface.
Defines the basic category of the microphone.
In the battle of Product Type,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Type on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Series/Line
What series/line does it belong to?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
60
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Seiren
vs
Series/Line
The HyperX QuadCast does not specify a Series/Line. The Razer Seiren X belongs to the 'Seiren' series, indicating it's part of a distinct product family.
Identifies the product line or collection the microphone belongs to.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Series/Line on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
The HyperX QuadCast S comes with a built-in mounting adapter, allowing you to easily attach it to both 5/8″ and 3/8″ threaded stands or boom arms. This makes it highly versatile, compatible with most standard microphone mounts used in streaming, podcasting, and recording setups.
Razer Seiren X
Compatible with most mic stands and boom arms, a 5/8" thread is standard for many professional setups.
The thread size for mounting compatibility.
In the battle of Mounting Thread Size,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Thread Size on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width?
9.84
inch
0Votes
1.97
inch
0Votes
vs
Width
The HyperX QuadCast has a width of 5.06 inches (12.85 cm), significantly wider than the Razer Seiren X which is 1.97 inches (5.0 cm) wide. The Seiren X is much more compact in width.
The microphone’s overall width.
In the battle of Width,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
7.9 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth?
4.06
inch
0Votes
1.97
inch
0Votes
vs
Depth
HyperX QuadCast measures 4 inches (10.16 cm) in depth, whereas Razer Seiren X is more compact at 1.97 inches (5.0 cm) deep. The Seiren X is considerably slimmer, making it suitable for smaller desks.
The microphone’s overall depth.
In the battle of Depth,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
2.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Weight
What is the weight?
0.56
lbs
0Votes
0.84
lbs
0Votes
vs
Weight
HyperX QuadCast weighs 0.55 lbs (0.25 kg), which is lighter than the Razer Seiren X at 0.84 lbs (0.38 kg). The QuadCast is the lighter option, potentially making it easier to transport or adjust on a stand.
The microphone’s physical weight.
In the battle of Weight,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
lower
0.3 lbs
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Weight on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the height?
5.08
inch
0Votes
7.24
inch
0Votes
vs
Height
The HyperX QuadCast stands 9.82 inches (24.94 cm) tall, which is noticeably taller than the Razer Seiren X at 7.24 inches (18.39 cm). The QuadCast has a more commanding presence in terms of height.
The microphone’s overall height.
In the battle of Height,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
lower
2.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Package Depth
What is the package depth?
4.41
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
HyperX Quadcast S
The depth of the package is roughly 11.2 cm, ensuring it is well-protected during shipping.
The shipping package’s depth.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Depth on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Package Height
What is the package height?
6.18
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
HyperX Quadcast S
With a height of about 15.7 cm, the package is compact and easy to store.
The shipping package’s height.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Height on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Diameter
What is the capsule diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.98
inch
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
The 25mm capsule diameter (about 1 inch) is typical for condenser microphones, providing balanced sound capture.
The diameter of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Diameter on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Base Footprint Diameter
What is the base/stand footprint diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3.54
inch
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
The stand base measures 9 cm in diameter, ensuring stability while keeping the mic compact and easy to place on a desk.
Diameter of the microphone base or stand footprint.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Base Footprint Diameter on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Package Width
What is the package width?
11.02
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The shipping package’s width.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Package Width on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
What is the cable length?
9.84
ft
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included or integrated cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Stand/Arm Length
What is the stand/arm length?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum length of included stand or boom arm.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stand/Arm Length on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Length
What is the capsule length?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The length of the microphone capsule.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Length on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Diameter
What is the grill diameter?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The diameter of the protective microphone grill.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Diameter on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
85
dB
0Votes
vs
Signal-to-Noise Ratio
HyperX QuadCast boasts a Signal-to-Noise Ratio of 90 dB, which is higher than the Razer Seiren X's 85 dB. A higher SNR means the QuadCast should produce clearer audio with less background noise.
The clarity ratio between signal and background noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Signal-to-Noise Ratio on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Min)
What is the minimum frequency response?
20
Hz
0Votes
20
Hz
0Votes
vs
Frequency Response (Min)
The minimum frequency response for both HyperX QuadCast and Razer Seiren X is 20 Hz. This means both microphones are capable of capturing very low-end audio frequencies.
The lowest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Min),
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
equal
20.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Min) on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Frequency Response (Max)
What is the maximum frequency response?
20,000
Hz
0Votes
20,000
Hz
0Votes
vs
Frequency Response (Max)
Both the HyperX QuadCast and Razer Seiren X offer a maximum frequency response of 20000 Hz. This ensures both microphones can capture high-fidelity treble notes up to the typical human hearing limit.
The highest frequency the mic can capture.
In the battle of Frequency Response (Max),
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
equal
20,000.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Frequency Response (Max) on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity
What is the sensitivity?
-36
dBV/Pa
0Votes
-35
dBV/Pa
0Votes
vs
Sensitivity
The HyperX QuadCast has a sensitivity of -36 dBV/Pa, which is slightly less sensitive than the Razer Seiren X at -35 dBV/Pa. The Seiren X can pick up sounds with slightly less input gain.
Output level relative to sound pressure.
In the battle of Sensitivity,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 dBV/Pa
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Directionality
What is the directionality?
37
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Unidirectional, Bidirectional, Omnidirectional
38
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Unidirectional
vs
Directionality
The HyperX QuadCast offers versatile directionality options including Unidirectional, Bidirectional, and Omnidirectional patterns. Razer Seiren X is limited to Unidirectional. The QuadCast provides more flexibility for different recording scenarios.
General pickup orientation.
In the battle of Directionality,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Directionality on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Stereo/Mono Mode
What mode is supported?
29
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Stereo
8
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Mono
vs
Stereo/Mono Mode
The HyperX QuadCast supports Stereo mode, allowing for a wider soundstage. In contrast, the Razer Seiren X operates in Mono mode. For spatial audio capture, the QuadCast is the better choice.
Determines recording mode.
In the battle of Stereo/Mono Mode,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stereo/Mono Mode on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Microphone Type
What is the microphone type?
29
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
USB
88
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Condenser
vs
Microphone Type
Both HyperX QuadCast and Razer Seiren X are Condenser microphones. This indicates they share the same fundamental microphone technology, known for sensitivity and detailed audio capture.
Defines the operating principle of the microphone.
In the battle of Microphone Type,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
lower
59 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Microphone Type on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Capsule Type
What is the capsule type?
48
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Electret
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
HyperX Quadcast S
The electret capsule is known for capturing clear, detailed sound with good sensitivity, ideal for streaming.
Specifies the capsule style that influences sound capture.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Capsule Type on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Max SPL
What is the maximum SPL?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
110
dB
0Votes
vs
Max SPL
Razer Seiren X has a Max SPL of 110 dB, indicating its tolerance for loud sounds without distortion. The HyperX QuadCast does not specify its Max SPL.
The maximum loudness before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Max SPL on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Output Impedance
What is the output impedance?
5
ohm
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
HyperX Quadcast S
With a low output impedance of 5 ohms, it ensures clear signal transmission with minimal loss.
Electrical resistance of the microphone’s output.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Impedance on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
THD
What is the THD (total Harmonic Distortion)?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.5
%
0Votes
vs
THD
Razer Seiren X reports a THD (Total Harmonic Distortion) of 0.5%, indicating its audio clarity. The THD value is not available for the HyperX QuadCast.
Distortion added at high volumes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
THD on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Isolation Feature
Does it have voice isolation?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
The voice isolation feature helps to reduce background noise, ensuring clear recordings.
Whether the mic includes isolation tech.
In the battle of Voice Isolation Feature,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Isolation Feature on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Principle
What is the acoustic principle?
69
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Pressure Gradient
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Acoustic Principle
The HyperX QuadCast operates on a Pressure Gradient acoustic principle. Information on the Acoustic Principle is not available for the Razer Seiren X.
The underlying sound capture mechanism.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Principle on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Transformer/Transformerless Design
What design does it use?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
98
Razer Seiren X
1Votes
Transformerless
The electrical coupling approach used.
Based on community votes for Transformer/Transformerless Design,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The transformerless design of the Seiren X is a subtle but important detail for audio quality. It typically means less noise and distortion, which I value for clear recordings. The Quadcast S doesn't specify this.
See more
Dynamic Range
What is the dynamic range?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The range between quietest and loudest sounds captured.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dynamic Range on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Terminating Impedance
What is the minimum terminating impedance?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The minimum load impedance required for optimal microphone performance and to avoid signal distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Terminating Impedance on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Equivalent Noise Level
What is the equivalent noise level?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The self-noise generated by the microphone.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Equivalent Noise Level on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Gain Range
What is the gain range?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The adjustable gain span.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Gain Range on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Pre-Attenuation Pad
What is the pre-attenuation pad?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Built-in reduction for handling loud signals.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pre-Attenuation Pad on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Low-Cut Filter
What is the low-cut filter cutoff?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Removes low-end rumble.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low-Cut Filter on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Headroom
What is the headroom?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Range above nominal operating level before distortion.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headroom on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Transient Response
What is the transient response?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Ability to capture sudden sound changes.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Transient Response on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Off-Axis Rejection
What is the off-axis rejection?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Sensitivity drop when sound comes from the side/rear.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Off-Axis Rejection on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Proximity Effect Control
Does it have proximity effect control?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Whether it has control for bass buildup at close range.
In the battle of Proximity Effect Control,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proximity Effect Control on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Overload Point
What is the overload point?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The SPL level where overload occurs.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overload Point on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating
What is the acoustic noise isolation rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Rating for rejecting ambient noise.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Noise Isolation Rating on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Polar Pattern Switching Precision
What is the switching precision?
67
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Stepped
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The accuracy of selectable polar patterns.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Polar Pattern Switching Precision on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Output Level
What is the output level?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The output voltage relative to input pressure.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Level on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Preamp Quality
What is the internal preamp quality?
98
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Studio-Grade
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Describes the built-in preamp’s fidelity.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Preamp Quality on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
The HyperX QuadCast does not support Dual Output Capability. However, the Razer Seiren X does have Dual Output Capability, which can be useful for simultaneous monitoring or recording to different destinations.
Ability to provide two simultaneous outputs.
In the battle of Dual Output Capability,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Based on community votes for Dual Output Capability,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The dual output capability on the Seiren X is a game-changer for my setup. It allows me to connect to different devices more easily, something the Quadcast S lacks.
The HyperX QuadCast does not have a detachable cable, which means if the cable is damaged, the unit may be harder to service. In contrast, the Razer Seiren X features a detachable cable, offering convenience for storage or replacement.
Whether the cable can be detached or replaced.
In the battle of Cable Detachable,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Detachable on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Ground Lift Switch,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ground Lift Switch on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Balanced/Unbalanced Output
What is the output type?
19
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Unbalanced
18
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Unbalanced
Razer Seiren X
The mic's output is unbalanced, typically used for simpler setups where professional-grade XLR is not needed.
Defines the type of electrical signal output.
In the battle of Balanced/Unbalanced Output,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Balanced/Unbalanced Output on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Connection Interface
What is the connection interface?
69
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
USB
48
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
USB, TRS
vs
Connection Interface
The HyperX QuadCast connects via a USB interface, whereas the Razer Seiren X offers both USB and TRS connection interfaces. The Seiren X provides more versatile connection options.
Defines the main interface for connectivity.
In the battle of Connection Interface,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
21 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connection Interface on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Technology
What wireless technology is used?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The wireless system type used.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Technology on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Bluetooth Version
What Bluetooth version does it support?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Version of Bluetooth supported (if applicable).
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Bluetooth Version on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
RF Frequency Range
What is the RF frequency range?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Frequency spectrum range for mics.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RF Frequency Range on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
USB Compatibility
What USB versions are compatible?
35
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
USB 2.0
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
USB Compatibility
HyperX QuadCast specifies USB 2.0 compatibility. The USB Compatibility information is not available for the Razer Seiren X.
Identifies supported USB standards.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Compatibility on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Audio Output Options
What are the audio output options?
49
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Analog
56
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Analog, Digital, Unbalanced
vs
Audio Output Options
The HyperX QuadCast provides Analog audio output options. The Razer Seiren X offers a broader range with Analog, Digital, and Unbalanced output options. The Seiren X provides more flexibility in how audio is outputted.
Lists output signal formats available.
In the battle of Audio Output Options,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
worse than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Audio Output Options on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Phantom Power Support
Does it support phantom power?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Whether the mic supports phantom power.
In the battle of Phantom Power Support,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Support on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Interface Latency
What is the interface latency?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Latency introduced by the interface.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interface Latency on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Device Pairing
Does it support multi-device pairing?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Ability to connect to multiple devices simultaneously.
In the battle of Multi-Device Pairing,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Device Pairing on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
XLR Pin Configuration
What is the XLR pin configuration?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies XLR wiring configuration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
XLR Pin Configuration on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Shielding Against RF Interference
Is there RF shielding?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Indicates built-in protection against RF interference.
In the battle of Shielding Against RF Interference,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shielding Against RF Interference on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the phantom power voltage needed.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Phantom Power Requirement on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
59
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
USB
58
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
USB
HyperX Quadcast S
Powered via USB, making it convenient to use with any compatible device without needing an external power source.
Razer Seiren X
Powered by USB (5V 100mA), so no additional adapters or power sources are required.
Defines how the microphone is powered.
In the battle of Power Source,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Power Indicator Light
Does it have a power indicator light?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
vs
Power Indicator Light
Both HyperX QuadCast and Razer Seiren X include a Power Indicator Light. This visually confirms when the microphones are receiving power and are operational.
Whether a light shows power/battery status.
In the battle of Power Indicator Light,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Indicator Light on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Power Consumption
What is the power consumption?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
0.5
Watt
0Votes
vs
Power Consumption
The Razer Seiren X has a low Power Consumption of 0.5 Watts. The power consumption is not specified for the HyperX QuadCast.
Amount of power drawn during use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Consumption on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Method
What is the charging method?
85
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
USB-C
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Charging Method
The HyperX QuadCast uses USB-C as its charging method, which is a modern and versatile standard. The charging method is not specified for the Razer Seiren X.
The interface used for recharging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Method on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Replaceable Battery Support
Does it support replaceable batteries?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
HyperX Quadcast S
The microphone does not have a replaceable battery, drawing power directly from the USB connection.
Indicates if batteries can be swapped.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replaceable Battery Support on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Type
What is the battery type?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The type of battery used if portable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Type on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Capacity
What is the battery capacity?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Storage capacity of the built-in battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Capacity on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Battery Life
What is the battery life?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How long the microphone operates per charge.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Battery Life on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Recharge Time
What is the recharge time?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Time required to fully recharge the battery.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recharge Time on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Power-Off
Does it have auto power-off?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Whether the microphone shuts down automatically when idle.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Power-Off on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
External Power Supply Compatibility
Is it compatible with an external power supply?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Can the mic run on external AC/DC supply.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
External Power Supply Compatibility on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
The HyperX QuadCast includes a Gain Control, allowing users to adjust microphone sensitivity directly. Razer Seiren X does not have onboard gain control, meaning adjustments would need to be made via software or the connected device.
Ability to adjust input gain directly.
In the battle of Gain Control,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Gain Control,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Onboard gain control is pretty essential for me. The HyperX Quadcast S having it built-in makes adjusting levels so much easier without needing extra software. The Seiren X missing this is a bit of a drawback.
The HyperX QuadCast S features a gain dial for precise volume control and a tap-to-mute sensor that lets you instantly mute the microphone with a simple touch. This combination provides intuitive, hands-on control without needing additional buttons, making it ideal for live streaming and recording sessions.
Types of direct physical controls.
In the battle of Onboard Controls,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
16 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Onboard Controls on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Touch/Motion Controls,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Touch/Motion Controls on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of EQ Presets,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EQ Presets on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Headphone Monitoring
Does it support headphone monitoring?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
The headphone monitoring feature allows you to listen to your own audio for real-time adjustments.
Razer Seiren X
Offers direct headphone monitoring with zero latency via the 3.5mm jack, so you can hear yourself in real-time.
Direct monitoring via headphone output.
In the battle of Headphone Monitoring,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Headphone Monitoring on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicator Lights
Does it have LED indicators?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
LED lights provide a visual cue to show the microphone's status, which is especially helpful for streamers.
Razer Seiren X
Equipped with an LED mute indicator light that turns red when the mic is muted.
Lights that show status such as mute, levels, or power.
In the battle of LED Indicator Lights,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicator Lights on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
On/Off Switch
Does it include an on/off switch?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
vs
On/Off Switch
The HyperX QuadCast includes an On/Off Switch for convenient power management. The Razer Seiren X does not have an explicit on/off switch.
Whether the microphone includes a physical on/off switch.
In the battle of On/Off Switch,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
On/Off Switch on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Monitoring Mix Control
Does it have monitoring mix control?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
vs
Monitoring Mix Control
HyperX QuadCast provides Monitoring Mix Control, allowing users to blend microphone input with computer audio. Razer Seiren X does not include this feature, limiting mix adjustment on the device itself.
Lets user adjust mic vs playback audio mix.
In the battle of Monitoring Mix Control,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Monitoring Mix Control on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
App/Software Integration
Is it integrated with software/apps?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
The microphone integrates with HyperX NGENUITY software, allowing for further customization and control of RGB lighting and effects.
Works with companion apps or software.
In the battle of App/Software Integration,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
App/Software Integration on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Effects
Does it include voice effects?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Built-in voice modulation effects.
In the battle of Voice Effects,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Effects on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Feedback Suppression
Does it have feedback suppression?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Prevents audio feedback loops in live use.
In the battle of Feedback Suppression,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Feedback Suppression on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Automatic Gain Adjustment
Does it support automatic gain adjustment?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Auto-adjusts mic gain for consistent output.
In the battle of Automatic Gain Adjustment,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Automatic Gain Adjustment on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Multi-Mode Switch
Does the microphone have a multi-mode switch?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Shows whether the microphone includes a switch to toggle between different recording modes or polar patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Mode Switch,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Mode Switch on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
One-touch Recording Button
Does it have a one-touch recording button?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
A single button to start recording instantly.
In the battle of One-touch Recording Button,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-touch Recording Button on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Lock Mode
Does it have a lock mode?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Prevents accidental control changes.
In the battle of Lock Mode,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Lock Mode on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Programmable Button Functions
Can buttons be programmed?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Allows customizing buttons to user preference.
In the battle of Programmable Button Functions,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Programmable Button Functions on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Sensitivity Preset Profiles
Does it have sensitivity presets?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Predefined sensitivity levels for various uses.
In the battle of Sensitivity Preset Profiles,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sensitivity Preset Profiles on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
The HyperX QuadCast features an Alloy body material, suggesting a more premium and durable build. In contrast, the Razer Seiren X is constructed with Plastic. The QuadCast likely offers a more robust feel.
The main structural material of the microphone body.
In the battle of Body Material,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
51 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Body Material,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Durability matters a lot to me, so the metal body of the Quadcast S is a big win. It just feels more premium and robust compared to the Seiren X's plastic build.
Both HyperX QuadCast and Razer Seiren X feature an Internal Shockmount. This helps to absorb vibrations and impacts, reducing unwanted noise in recordings.
Capsule isolation that reduces handling noise.
In the battle of Internal Shockmount,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Shockmount on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Shock Mount
Is a shock mount included?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
vs
Shock Mount
Both HyperX QuadCast and Razer Seiren X include a Shock Mount. This helps to isolate the microphone from vibrations and handling noise.
Whether a shock mount is included to reduce vibrations.
In the battle of Shock Mount,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Shock Mount on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Pop Filter
Is a pop filter included?
Yes
1Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
vs
Pop Filter
The HyperX QuadCast comes with a Pop Filter, which helps reduce plosive sounds. The Razer Seiren X does not include a pop filter, so users may need to purchase one separately for optimal vocal recording.
Whether a pop filter is provided for plosive reduction.
In the battle of Pop Filter,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Pop Filter,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Having an integrated pop filter is super convenient. The Quadcast S includes one, which means one less accessory I have to buy and set up. It really helps with plosives.
See more
Finish/Coating
What finish/coating does it have?
69
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Matte
68
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Matte
Razer Seiren X
Finished with a matte coating, reducing glare and giving it a sleek, professional appearance.
Exterior treatment or surface finish.
In the battle of Finish/Coating,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Finish/Coating on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Mount
Is the mount detachable?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Razer Seiren X
The microphone can be detached from its stand for easier setup with other equipment.
If the mount can be detached for flexibility.
In the battle of Detachable Mount,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Mount on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Grill Material
What is the grill material?
59
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Metal
58
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Metal
vs
Grill Material
The HyperX QuadCast uses Steel for its grill material, while the Razer Seiren X uses a general Metal. Steel is a specific type of metal known for durability.
The material of the protective mic grill.
In the battle of Grill Material,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grill Material on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Corrosion Resistance
Is it corrosion resistant?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
Corrosion resistance ensures durability, especially in humid environments where other mics might deteriorate.
Indicates if materials resist corrosion.
In the battle of Corrosion Resistance,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Corrosion Resistance on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Water Resistance
Is it water resistant?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Indicates if the mic is resistant to water.
In the battle of Water Resistance,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Water Resistance on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Dust Resistance
Is it dust resistant?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Indicates if the mic is resistant to dust.
In the battle of Dust Resistance,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dust Resistance on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
Is it drop resistant?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Indicates if the mic is designed to survive accidental drops.
In the battle of Drop Resistance,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Adjustable Arm/Stand
Does it have an adjustable arm/stand?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Whether the arm/stand can be adjusted.
In the battle of Adjustable Arm/Stand,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adjustable Arm/Stand on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Swivel/Pivot Capability
Does it have swivel/pivot capability?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
vs
Swivel/Pivot Capability
The HyperX QuadCast does not have Swivel/Pivot Capability. In contrast, the Razer Seiren X does, offering more flexibility in adjusting the microphone's angle without moving the entire stand.
Whether the microphone head or stand can rotate.
In the battle of Swivel/Pivot Capability,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Swivel/Pivot Capability on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Design
Is it foldable?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Indicates if the mic or its stand can fold for portability.
In the battle of Foldable Design,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Design on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Dampening Material
What is the internal dampening material?
79
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Foam
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The material used internally to reduce noise/vibration.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Dampening Material on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Resistance Rating
What is the heat resistance rating?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum heat level the mic can withstand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Resistance Rating on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Neodymium Magnet
Does it use a neodymium magnet?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
States whether the capsule uses a neodymium magnet for stability.
In the battle of Neodymium Magnet,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Neodymium Magnet on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Extra Windscreen,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Extra Windscreen on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Cables
Are cables included?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
The microphone comes with the necessary USB cable, making it ready for use straight out of the box.
Indicates if connecting cables are provided.
In the battle of Cables,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cables on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Adapters
Are adapters included?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
vs
Adapters
The HyperX QuadCast includes Adapters, which can be useful for compatibility with various mounting options. Razer Seiren X does not come with adapters.
States if adapter(s) are included (e.g., XLR to 3.5mm).
In the battle of Adapters,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adapters on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Protective Foam Insert
Is protective foam included?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Razer Seiren X
Protective foam insert included in the packaging to safeguard the microphone during shipping.
Indicates if protective foam is part of packaging.
In the battle of Protective Foam Insert,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protective Foam Insert on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Carrying Case
Is there a carrying case included?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Whether a protective carrying case is part of the package.
In the battle of Carrying Case,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carrying Case on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Instruction Manual
Is an instruction manual included?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Whether a manual or quick-start guide is included.
In the battle of Instruction Manual,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Instruction Manual on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Packaging Type
What is the packaging type?
19
HyperX Quadcast S
0Votes
Box
18
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
Box
Defines how the product is packaged.
In the battle of Packaging Type,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Packaging Type on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Spare Parts Availability
Are spare parts available?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Whether the manufacturer provides replacement parts.
In the battle of Spare Parts Availability,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Spare Parts Availability on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Stickers/Branding
Are stickers/branding included?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
vs
Stickers/Branding
HyperX QuadCast includes Stickers/Branding in its package for enthusiasts. Razer Seiren X does not come with stickers or additional branding items.
Indicates if stickers or branded items are in the package.
In the battle of Stickers/Branding,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Stickers/Branding on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Optional Windshield Model
What is the recommended windshield model?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Manufacturer-recommended windshield model.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Optional Windshield Model on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Certified for professional broadcasting, the QuadCast S meets high standards for clarity and reliability.
Indicates if the mic meets pro broadcast standards.
In the battle of Professional Broadcast Certification,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Professional Broadcast Certification on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty
What is the warranty period?
2
years
1Votes
1
years
0Votes
vs
Warranty
The HyperX QuadCast offers a 2-year warranty, providing a longer period of coverage compared to the Razer Seiren X's 1-year warranty. The QuadCast offers greater peace of mind with its extended warranty.
Duration of manufacturer warranty coverage.
In the battle of Warranty,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1.0 years
measurement.
Based on community votes for Warranty,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 0 votes.
A longer warranty gives me more peace of mind. The Quadcast S offers 2 years which is double what the Seiren X provides. That's definitely a factor for me when buying electronics.
See more
Safety Compliance
Is it safety compliant?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
The microphone meets necessary safety standards, ensuring it’s safe to use in your setup.
Indicates adherence to safety regulations.
In the battle of Safety Compliance,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Compliance on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Compliance
Is it environmentally compliant?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
The product complies with environmental standards, ensuring responsible production and disposal.
Compliance with eco/environmental regulations.
In the battle of Environmental Compliance,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Compliance on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
FCC/CE Approval
Is it FCC/CE approved?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
The microphone is certified by the FCC and CE, ensuring it meets international communication standards.
Explicit FCC/CE compliance approval.
In the battle of FCC/CE Approval,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
FCC/CE Approval on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
RoHS Compliance
Is it RoHS compliant?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
Yes
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
RoHS compliance ensures that the microphone is free of harmful substances like lead and mercury.
Restriction of Hazardous Substances directive compliance.
In the battle of RoHS Compliance,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
RoHS Compliance on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Range (Operating)
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
46
Razer Seiren X
0Votes
32° to 104°F
Razer Seiren X
The operating temperature range is suitable for most indoor environments, from a chilly room to a warmer studio.
Operating temperature window for reliable use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Range (Operating) on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Low latency monitoring ensures there is minimal delay between what you speak and what is heard, important for live streaming.
Provides near real-time monitoring with minimal delay.
In the battle of Low Latency Monitoring,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Low Latency Monitoring on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Cloud Profile Storage,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cloud Profile Storage on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Smart Assistant Compatibility
Is it compatible with smart assistants?
83
HyperX Quadcast S
1Votes
Alexa, Siri, Google Assistant
Who knows?
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Smart Assistant Compatibility
The HyperX QuadCast is compatible with Smart Assistants like Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant. Smart Assistant Compatibility is not specified for the Razer Seiren X.
Integration with voice assistants.
Based on community votes for Smart Assistant Compatibility,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Razer Seiren X ◉,
which got 0 votes.
I'm all about smart home integration, so the Quadcast S being compatible with Alexa, Siri, and Google Assistant is a cool bonus. It adds a modern touch that the Seiren X doesn't offer.
See more
Multi-Pattern Switching
Does it support multi-pattern switching?
Yes
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
vs
Multi-Pattern Switching
The HyperX QuadCast features Multi-Pattern Switching, allowing users to select from various polar patterns. Razer Seiren X does not support multi-pattern switching. The QuadCast is more versatile for different recording environments.
Ability to switch between multiple pickup patterns.
In the battle of Multi-Pattern Switching,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
better than
Razer Seiren X ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Multi-Pattern Switching on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
DSP Processing
Does it include DSP processing?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
HyperX Quadcast S
The microphone does not feature digital signal processing, which may limit audio manipulation options.
Built-in digital signal processing for sound shaping.
In the battle of DSP Processing,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
DSP Processing on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
AI Noise Cancellation
Does it feature AI noise cancellation?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
AI-powered suppression of background noise.
In the battle of AI Noise Cancellation,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
AI Noise Cancellation on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Beamforming Technology
Does it support beamforming?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Uses mic arrays to focus on sound sources.
In the battle of Beamforming Technology,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Beamforming Technology on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Voice Tracking
Does it include voice tracking?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Automatically follows speaker’s voice.
In the battle of Voice Tracking,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voice Tracking on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Recording Profiles
Does it have recording profiles?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Predefined sound settings for specific uses.
In the battle of Recording Profiles,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Recording Profiles on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Surround Capture Mode
Does it support surround capture?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Ability to capture immersive 360° or surround sound.
In the battle of Surround Capture Mode,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surround Capture Mode on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Calibration
Does it support auto calibration?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Automatically adjusts mic response to environment.
In the battle of Auto Calibration,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Calibration on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgrade Support
Does it support firmware upgrades?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Ability to update functionality via firmware.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgrade Support on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation
Does it feature acoustic modeling?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Simulates room acoustics or mic characteristics.
In the battle of Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Acoustic Modeling/Room Simulation on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Dual Capsule Blending
Does it support dual capsule blending?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Blends outputs of dual capsules for tonal flexibility.
In the battle of Dual Capsule Blending,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Dual Capsule Blending on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Hum-Compensating Coil
Does it have a hum-compensating coil?
No
0Votes
HyperX Quadcast S
No
0Votes
Razer Seiren X
Indicates if the mic includes a humbucking coil to reduce electrical interference.
In the battle of Hum-Compensating Coil,
HyperX Quadcast S ◉ is
same as
Razer Seiren X ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Hum-Compensating Coil on HyperX Quadcast S ◉
vs Razer Seiren X ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Sound Quality
How would you rate the sound quality of this microphone?
Crisp and professional
0Votes
0Votes
Good and clear
0Votes
0Votes
Average clarity
0Votes
0Votes
Distorted and unclear
0Votes
0Votes
Noise Handling
How well does this microphone handle background noise?
Blocks out most noise
0Votes
0Votes
Handles noise fairly well
0Votes
0Votes
Reduces some noise
0Votes
0Votes
Picks up everything
0Votes
0Votes
Battery Life
How long does the battery last on this microphone?
Excellent — Over 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Long lasting — 10 to 20 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent — 5 to 10 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Short — 2 to 5 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very short — Under 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Durability
How durable is this microphone based on build and lifespan?
Highly durable — Over 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Solid — 2 to 4 years
0Votes
0Votes
Average — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very fragile — Less than 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Weight
How heavy is this microphone?
Ultra-light — Under 150 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Lightweight — 150 to 300 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Medium — 300 to 500 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy — 500 to 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Very heavy — Over 800 grams
0Votes
0Votes
Design Appeal
How attractive is the design of this microphone?
Plain and boring
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat okay
0Votes
0Votes
Nice looking
0Votes
0Votes
Stylish and modern
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing
How do you feel about the price of this microphone?
Great value for money
0Votes
0Votes
Pretty good price
0Votes
0Votes
Fair deal
0Votes
0Votes
Kinda pricey
0Votes
0Votes
Crazy expensive
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitivity
How sensitive is this microphone to capturing sound?
Very sensitive — Detects quiet sounds clearly
0Votes
0Votes
Sensitive — Captures a wide sound range
0Votes
0Votes
Moderate — Picks up normal voice levels well
0Votes
0Votes
Low — Needs to be close to sound source
0Votes
0Votes
Very low — Struggles to capture soft voices
0Votes
0Votes
Frequency Response Range
What do you think about the frequency response range of this microphone?
Wide range — 20 Hz to 20 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Good range — 30 Hz to 18 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Decent range — 40 Hz to 16 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Limited range — 50 Hz to 14 kHz
0Votes
0Votes
Narrow range — Above 60 Hz only
0Votes
0Votes
Connectivity
How stable and reliable is the connection of this microphone?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
13
19
20
20
